[86051] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Fri Oct 21 09:34:30 2005
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
To: "'Joe Maimon'" <jmaimon@ttec.com>,
"'Owen DeLong'" <owen@delong.com>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:33:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4358EBBF.8030803@ttec.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Considering that most people who are in favor of multihoming
> for ipv6 believe that there is customer demand for it, the
> market forces would decide this one.
We have nobody but ourselves to blame for this. If we all ran
networks that worked as well as our customers demand and didn't have
our petty peering squables every full moon, the market wouldn't
feel the need to have to dual home.
