[85656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 vs nanog
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Sat Oct 15 00:37:47 2005
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:32:26 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <480024D6-5E4C-49FC-BAED-49BE34AF9439@sackheads.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Not directly aimed at William: As others have said before (and I
> finally listened) PLEASE take this discussion to the shim6 list.
there are some reasons why i'd rather have the discussion here...
) IETF IPR and legal restraints on postings
) shim6 is a protocol design working group, not an operational wg
* the IETF has always done operations poorly, it seems worse these days.
) there are enough folks on both that they can "represent" to shim6 list as needed/desired
--bill
