[85616] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 14 15:49:14 2005
To: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:39:58 +0200."
<20051014193958.GA32445@srv01.cluenet.de>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:48:09 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1129319289_3033P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:39:58 +0200, Daniel Roesen said:
> Nope. The ULID is supposed to be static, globally unique. Just not
> globally routed. Seperating topology from identification.
>
> Something I didn't see discussed yet is that shim6 sites would need to
> get a globally unique, provider independent /48 or larger... which folks
> could start to announce. But I guess that address space would come from
> blocks earmarked as "non-routable, it's a bogon, bad IP space, filter in
> BGP at first sight!". :-)
You know, if you describe it that way too many times, people who are only paying
half-attention are going to say "IPv6 has something almost like NAT, only different".
--==_Exmh_1129319289_3033P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDUAt5cC3lWbTT17ARAvgIAKDQBQSRtF7mHWNowRactM++hnJa0wCfWdLC
Q3y4cwqcUXsuCvGs5DjuSi8=
=x9pQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1129319289_3033P--
