[85388] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Level 3's side of the story
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rik van Riel)
Sat Oct 8 12:41:50 2005
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510080029440.10349@soloth.lewis.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Jon Lewis wrote:
> If you're multihomed and using Cogent as a cheap bandwidth whore, does
> it matter if their cheap bandwidth gives you 155k routes instead of 168k
> routes? After all, if its cheap and off-loads enough traffic from your
> more expensive 168k route circuits, isn't it doing what you bought it
> for?
I wonder if Cogent customers can get their money back if more
than 0.1% of their packets go to L3 single-homed networks ;)
http://www.cogentco.com/htdocs/internet.php?current=10
Product Features:
FULL SLA: Our SLA guarantees 99.99% network availability, 99.9% packet
delivery, less than 50 milliseconds roundtrip latency and proactive outage
notification within 15 minutes.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
