|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:41:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <43460D9D.3080009@equinephotoart.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, JC Dill wrote: > to pay (anyone) to transit the data. Why does L3 care if Cogent sends the > data for free via peering, or pays someone ELSE to transit the data? Anything to increase a competitors spending must be good, right? The more expenses a competitor has, the higher their price when they sell to customers, and the less likely they are to take potential customers? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |