[85263] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Champeon)
Thu Oct 6 17:08:09 2005
X-Received-From: schampeo@habanero.hesketh.net
X-Delivered-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:07:33 -0400
From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@hesketh.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20051006202554.6113F136C82@aharp.ittns.northwestern.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
on Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:25:54PM -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:54:34 +0100
> Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
>
> > > While I realize that the "nuke survivable" thing is probably an old
> > > wives tale, it seems ridiculous that "the Internet" can't adjust by
> [...]
> > It's not a myth. If the Internet were running RIP instead of BGP
>
> For the Internet, I believe it was indeed a myth. I wasn't there,
> but according to someone who was:
>
> <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/2004-April/003940.html>
I believe the mental->mythical sequence went something like:
- some people (Paul Baran among them) were interested in ways to build
communications networks that could survive lots of damage, and came
up with the idea of distributed networks that could route through
multiple redundant nodes
- the US was in a cold war and nuclear arms race
- a nuclear attack could inflict lots of damage to communications
networks
- the Internet was eventually, to some extent, built as a distributed
network with routing through multiple redundant nodes (if nothing
else, the protocols that ran it were capable of such)
- the Internet was therefore built to survive a nuclear attack
QED, HTH, HAND
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
antispam news, solutions for sendmail, exim, postfix: http://enemieslist.com/
