[85246] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Erik Haagsman)
Thu Oct 6 12:24:17 2005
From: Erik Haagsman <erik@we-dare.net>
Reply-To: erik@we-dare.net
To: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4345492B.2040905@greendragon.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:06:53 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:56 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> > Let me be the punching bag for pondering this on NANOG... What about the
> > roles of governments building a consortium with Teir-1 NSP's where those
> > backbone Tiers are regulated and have predefined, strictly enforced
> > rulesets they'd have to follow. The irony of this is that it sounds both
> > like a nightmare and a dream.
> >
</snip>
> This partitioning is exactly what we predicted in many meetings when
> discussion the terms of the contracts.
>
> Markets are inefficient for infrastructure and tend toward monopoly.
How does replacing non-profit organisations (which most public IX'es
are) with government bodies and governmental legislation improve
anything...?
> Idiot laissez-faire pseudo-libertarians forget that all markets require
> regulation and politics.
But why government regulated instead of IX member regulated...?
--
---
Erik Haagsman
Network Architect
We Dare BV
Tel: +31(0)10-7507008
Fax: +31(0)10-7507005
http://www.we-dare.nl
