[85238] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public Works Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Spenceley)
Thu Oct 6 10:47:06 2005
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0510061014230.24134@kungfunix.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
From: James Spenceley <james@iroute.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:46:23 +0300
To: "J. Oquendo" <sil@politrix.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> A consortium of companies using this NAP would engineer the network
> since
> most times government officials have little clue on the engineering
> side
> of things, nor would they understand it more than those already in the
> industry.
Having read this thread,
I'm going to assume most of the engineers who want to peer there, are
no more qualified than said government officials.
> This NAP would be unbiased as to "my bgp tables are bigger than
> yours" arguments, and would pass traffic unbiased to most destinations
> without flaw.
the time of MLPA has long since passed, let it rest in peace.
> J. Oquendo
--
James
