[85169] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (vijay gill)
Wed Oct 5 17:50:39 2005
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:08:19 -0400
From: vijay gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>
To: Richard Irving <rirving@antient.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <43443F3F.4090307@antient.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Richard Irving wrote:
> Richard Irving wrote:
>
>> </lurk> Maybe not, the depeering L3 is involved in is sort of like
>> blackmail,
>>
>>> we can all thank the indicted ex-CEO of WorldCom, Bernie Ebbers,
>>> for the modern peering "There can only be one" rule set.
>>
>>
>> Because you were there at the time Ebbers was going around? Do you
>> have any idea of how this works? I am going to go ahead and say no.
>>
> Brzzzt! lost both points.
>
> My prior email was rirving@onecall.net, Charter Nanog member.
>
> 8-)
>
Then perhaps you'd know better than to think that Bernie knew what
peering even was? Apparently not.
/vijay
