[85079] in North American Network Operators' Group
GigE Peering Router
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Network Lists)
Tue Oct 4 13:40:19 2005
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:39:47 -0700
From: Network Lists <network.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Network Lists <network.lists@gmail.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_5615_20825645.1128447587989
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello,
I was looking for some opinions on Cisco vs. Foundry (specifically Cisco's
NPE-G1 vs a NetIron 4802). The application is mainly content delivery -
outbound heavy traffic with an emphasis on quality of delivery.
Basically I'm looking at the 4802 because we're able to provision GigE for
all the providers, so we don't really need an architecture that can support
OC-type interfaces. The size is also attractive for some of our smaller
PoPs.
I'm also intereted in failover/hot-standby capabilities on the Foundry as
we have had much experience with them.
Best,
Lance
------=_Part_5615_20825645.1128447587989
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<div>Hello,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I was looking for some opinions on Cisco vs. Foundry (specifically Cis=
co's NPE-G1 vs a NetIron 4802). The application is mainly content delivery =
- outbound heavy traffic with an emphasis on quality of delivery. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Basically I'm looking at the 4802 because we're able to provision GigE=
for all the providers, so we don't really need an architecture that can su=
pport OC-type interfaces. The size is also attractive for some of our small=
er PoPs.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I'm also intereted in failover/hot-standby capabilities on the Foundry=
as we have had much experience with them.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Lance</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
------=_Part_5615_20825645.1128447587989--
