[84715] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: router worms and International Infrastructure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Wed Sep 21 11:52:34 2005
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:51:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509211248110.20427@netcore.fi>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>,
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> Btw. Juniper's Feasible Path uRPF (mentioned in RFC3704) is your
> friend, even on multihomed/asymmetric links.
So, say I'm a large consumer broadband ISP, and I made the decision some
years ago to use net-10 as my infrastructure space? How does 'feasible
path' help block 10.x.x.x sources exactly?
