[84430] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multi-6 [WAS: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Tue Sep 13 10:07:39 2005
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:03:27 -0400
From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch@corp.earthlink.net>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Cc: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <web-2971381@multicasttech.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:41:51 -0400
> John Payne <john@sackheads.org> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sep 12, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I'll be blunt. As long as that question is up in the air, none of
>>>>the major content providers are going to do anything serious in the
>>>>IPv6 arena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Well, I have no evidence of them doing anything with IPv6 anyway, so I
>>>don't know if this makes a difference.
>>>
>>>
>>I have a very strong feeling that part of the lack of content providers
>>on IPv6 is due to the lack of multihoming.
>>
>>
>>
>
>No, I would say it is due to the lack of an audience that can _only_ be reached
>(or even _best_ be reached) using IPv6.
>
>Once the audience is there, the content providers will follow.
>
>
Same issue really. Audience isn't going to mature until those issues
are sorted.
