[84367] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Mon Sep 12 01:11:27 2005
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 05:06:36 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <BF4A7554.127A3A%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
> I recall last month in our web servers was something like 8% with IPv6
> (average), but in my opinion most of the IPv6 traffic is peer-to-peer so not
8% seems high to me as well, I don't think I've ever seen my v6 traffic
over 1% honestly :( Why do you think it's mostly P2P traffic? Are there
P2P applications that prefer v6 over v4? or only work on v6? If a host has
v6 capabilities, in my experience, it'll use them atleast as often as v4
when given the chance.
I think the last v6 traffic study I saw still said +90% of the v6 traffic
was still ping/traceroute :(
