[84348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Katrina Network Damage Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Sep 11 22:24:34 2005
To: ops.lists@gmail.com
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>,
Alan Spicer <a_spicer@bellsouth.net>,
Steve Gibbard <scg@gibbard.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:32:36 +0530."
<bb0e440a05091119025e894318@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:23:44 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1126491824_4179P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:32:36 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
>
> On 12/09/05, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu> wrote:
> > Drop me a line when your botnet finishes scanning 3FFE:0000::/16 and moves
> > on to 2001:xxxx::
>
> It is a v6 botnet - so a correspondingly larger number of infected
> hosts, and larger botnet size
> If it is your argument that scanning just won't scale on a botnet,
> anything can be made to scale if you throw sufficient resources that
> aren't your own - botted toasters, like i said - at it
A /48 is 80 bits of address. 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 addresses.
Even at a million packets/second (which even Joe Sixpack will quite likely
notice until such time as the Linksys router you get at Walmart does 1M pps),
that's still 38,334,786,263 years of scanning. Of course, that's about
20 billion years after the Sun runs out of hydrogen and goes red giant and
incinerates the planet....
Now how big a pile of toasters were you planning to use?
--==_Exmh_1126491824_4179P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDJOavcC3lWbTT17ARAnY4AKDd2KX9boNtuMnenFOJWgdc57W84QCgsUe+
ipEFCU0SOwjoWqcAGvWxESI=
=8yF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1126491824_4179P--
