[84317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multi-6 [WAS: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W.Gilmore)
Sun Sep 11 02:34:23 2005
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509110626220.21650@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:31:42 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> Content providers and other large business, without who's funds
>> the Internet would fail, have a right not to be tied to a single
>> provider. And while I
>
> Giving each entity who wants to multihome an AS of their own and
> own address block, doesn't scale. Think this in the way of each
> home in the world being multihomed, it just doesn't scale.
We disagree. And your hyperbole doesn't come close to proving your
argument.
> IPv6 solved the addressing problem, not the routing problem, in the
> current model. Let's try to fix the routing problem NOW instead of
> 5-10 years down the road.
Yes, let's.
See you on shim6.
--
TTFN,
patrick
