[84167] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SWIP and Rwhois in the Real World
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Sullivan)
Tue Sep 6 22:43:05 2005
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:42:31 +1000
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew@sorbs.net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509061709001.8348@sokol.elan.net>
To: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "william" == william(at)elan net <william@elan.net> writes:
>>>>>>
>>
>> william> The above line is as clear as it gets (if the other two
>> william> mentions that data is to be made available to public is not
>> william> enough), so there this argument that rwhois should be made
>> william> available only to ARIN is now against ARIN's policies and
>> william> whoever you know who is still making it should be pointed to
>> william> URL I listed.
>>
>> NetRange: 4.0.0.0 - 4.255.255.255
>> ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.level3.net:4321
>>
>> % telnet rwhois.level3.net 4321
>> Trying 209.244.1.179...
>> telnet: connect to address 209.244.1.179: Operation timed out
>>
>> Doesn't seem to have made much difference yet...
>
>
> Its kind of hard for ARIN to enforce its policies on L3 when they have
> a /8 already and are not likely to ask for additional allocation...
>
> But obviously L3 is not giving a very good example for others, so we
> can all now say - don't be like L3 :)
>
Does ARIN have a policy that allows deallocation based on not conforming
to the requirements of allocations...?
(Might sound ridiculous, but if it works.....)
Regards,
Mat
