[83985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Replacing PSTN with VoIP wise? Was Re: Phone networks struggle in Hurricane Katrina's wake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Sep 1 13:38:09 2005
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc: Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org>, NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:48:04 +0300."
<43169614.4090009@he.iki.fi>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:37:26 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1125596246_3440P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:48:04 +0300, Petri Helenius said:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> >It's clearly possible to find telco engineers with 5/10/15 years experience in
> >running PSTN (might even find somebody with 40-50 years? :). It's possible to
> >find network engineers with lots of BGP experience. Where do you find a senior
> >engineer with 5+ years experience in enterprise-scale VoIP deployment?
> Deployable enterprise VoIP products existed in 1998. So it would be
> somebody who was there doing it back then? Goes 5+ with a margin.
Yes, but I hear that both of the guys who actually *DEPLOYED* anything
enterprise-wide in 1998 are happily employed and not available.
--==_Exmh_1125596246_3440P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDFzxWcC3lWbTT17ARAqZ6AKDQpltKA+EgSEyokNFuEyzpxAyq5QCfS5sq
IfvzS5rHf0mBY+fq+eiIWh4=
=VJ0c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1125596246_3440P--
