|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: David Hagel <david.hagel@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:38:32 PDT."
<c6ae07ec05082118384b9ce10a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:00:12 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1124676012_5228P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:38:32 PDT, David Hagel said:
> Would there be any data out there on what fraction from this 60ms to
> 80ms RTT is raw propagation delay and what fraction is typical packet
> queuing delay at intermediate switches? Does queuing delay play much
> of a role at all these days? Or is it all just propagation delay?
Measure the distance, figure the signal is moving at 60% of the speed
of light, and anything over that is queueing/switching delay.
This of course assumes that you have some idea how the cable runs....
--==_Exmh_1124676012_5228P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDCTGscC3lWbTT17ARAhrUAKDJNK6eqUwwMcMZjo8n6+kWWvLVjACffs3f
GoQXhKK0ekIGsTAcGoX95Bc=
=7rJ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1124676012_5228P--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |