[83668] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Rip again!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Ranch)
Sun Aug 21 14:19:09 2005

Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:15:40 -0400
From: "Chris Ranch" <CRanch@Affinity.com>
To: <swm@emanon.com>, "Tom Sanders" <toms.sanders@gmail.com>,
	<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


In case no one else has suggested it: the source MAC address will
identify the source.

Chris=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Scott Morris
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:21 AM
> To: 'Tom Sanders'; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Rip again!
>=20
>=20
> How about the source IP?
>=20
> RIP v1 is sent to 255.255.255.255 broadcast.  RIPv2 is sent=20
> to 224.0.0.9 multicast.  Both are local-link only, so won't=20
> go THROUGH a router.  The sending source IP will tell you=20
> where they came from.
>=20
> If you're using VLANs (trunks), there won't be any issues. =20
> If you're using
> secondary addresses, this will depend on whose devices you=20
> use.   In the
> Cisco world, packets will always be sourced from the primary=20
> IP address on an interface.  And if the receiving router=20
> doesn't have a subnet matching the sender, packets/updates=20
> are ignored.  (Again, Cisco world you can use "no=20
> validate-update-source" to override this check)
>=20
> But that gives you a tracking method on packets. =20
>=20
> Scott=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Tom Sanders
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:13 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Rip again!
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> There isnt IMO a way in RIP to identify the source of the RIP=20
> packet (the way we have Router ID in OSPF, system ID in ISIS, etc.)
>=20
> Now assume we have 2 vlans defined on an ethernet. Thus we=20
> would have two IP interfaces, 1.1.1.1/24 and 2.2.2.2/24 and=20
> both using the same physical interface. RIP is running on=20
> both these interfaces.
>=20
> My doubt is that how will another router, which is configured=20
> in the same way (2 vlans) be able to differentiate between=20
> the RIP responses originated by 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Toms
>=20
>=20

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post