[83331] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Wed Aug 10 20:27:37 2005
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:23:39 -0400
From: Kevin Loch <kloch@hotnic.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <17146.32985.754297.573869@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Roy Badami wrote:
> And on that vein perhaps it's prudent for people using network
> prefixes longer than /64 to take care to ensure that the bit positions
> in the IPv6 address that should correspond to the u and g bits in the
> modified EUI-64 interface ID (according to RFC 3513) are both set to
Is there any known use for those bits?
- Kevin
