|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <20050810164849.GE18662@vacation.karoshi.com.> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:54:10 +0200 To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On 10-aug-2005, at 18:48, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> This creates the situation where people try to >> make do with a /56, find out that they need a /48 after all (all >> those /64 ptps...) and have to renumber. > ah... so is there the admission that renumbering in IPv6 > is pretty much a myth? Renumbering hosts in IPv6 is a breeze. You just change some settings in the routers and the rest happens automatically. It's more renumbering information in the DNS and filters and such that's a problem, regardless of IP version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |