[83249] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /8 end user assignment?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Mon Aug 8 12:35:45 2005
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:34:11 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <BF1CD77B.DB01%dgolding@burtongroup.com>
To: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Cc: William Warren <hescominsoon@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:
> On 8/7/05 4:54 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, William Warren wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I think i did not make myself clear. The corrections off-list are
> >> valid..:) However the modems are accessed by the providers using
> >> RFC1918 space and not public IP space. This is true it does not mean
> >
> > and there was a mention at IETF by Alian of comcast (formerly of FT I
> > thought?) that comcast was looking at an immediate ipv6 rollout: "because
> > net 10 is not big enough"... 'immediate' on some scale not 'ten years out'
> > (no timeframes mentioned, sorry)
>
> I suspect Comcast's mouth is bigger than its stomach, as it were. They have
> a few other things they may want to tackle before rolling out v6. I don't
> see a Comcact v6 rollout positively impacting their reliability.
oh, you mean like how are they going to manage that device which is
imbedded and doesn't know from v6 today? :) yea, I was just repeating a
quote from the conference, nothing more. Funny though it was.
