[83191] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FCC Issues Rule Allowing FBI to Dictate Wiretap-Friendly Design for In ternet Services
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Aug 7 00:08:16 2005
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:26:23 PDT."
<42F5552F.7020603@tony.li>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:07:44 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1123387664_21232P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:26:23 PDT, Tony Li said:
> I'm sorry, but this is simply an unsupportable statement. What is
> required of routers is that the provider be able to configure the devic=
e
> to make copies of certain packets to a monitoring port. Assuming that
> the monitoring port is duly managed, how does this qualify as =22insecu=
re=22?
It qualifies as =22insecure=22 because if that rather dubious assumption =
fails to
be true, you have a big problem.
--==_Exmh_1123387664_21232P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFC9YkQcC3lWbTT17ARAuZnAJ4549qY28+JLCi+3AYVoXk0sbXE4ACdHnxz
7P+V/7Ya0dPFJoOtIbIDxRE=
=/7O/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1123387664_21232P--
