[83091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /8 end user assignment?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Thu Aug 4 18:19:26 2005
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:18:13 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <20050804192512.GB9865@srv01.cluenet.de>
To: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:35:24PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > 2. We know cable companies, dsl providers and mobile companies can use
> > this many IPs, but they generally seem to make use of NAT and IPv6.
>
> So you ask folks to resort to hacks like NAT or force IPv6-only to their
> users when there is still a lack-of-content problem there? Can you show
> me your business plan draft for that? I'm curious. :-)
I meant to ask this at a nanog or this IETF... why don't some of the
larger content providers (google, msn, yahoo, to name 3 examples) put AAAA
records in for their maint content pieces? why don't they get v6
connectivity from their providers (that offer such services) ? There are
starting to be more and more folks with v6 connectivity... it'd be
interesting as a way to drive usage on v6, eh?
>
> BTW, Softbank got 2400:2000::/20.
holy freeholy! good thing v6 space is 'infinite' eh? :)
-Chris
