[82968] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (trainier@kalsec.com)
Tue Aug 2 15:50:38 2005
In-Reply-To: <17135.52199.88840.172197@roam.psg.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: trainier@kalsec.com
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:50:00 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the=20
specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained
instances where folks were being insulting and crude.=20
Tim Rainier
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>=20
Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
08/02/2005 03:39 PM
To
"Chris Ranch" <CRanch@Affinity.com>
cc
Bj=F8rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>, "Christopher L. Morrow"=20
<christopher.morrow@mci.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Subject
RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
> But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices...
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml
the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i
believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a
bit wider than v6.
the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to
discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation.
randy
