[82360] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Google Said..... Was: RE: London incidents

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hannigan, Martin)
Wed Jul 13 01:27:18 2005

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:26:41 -0400
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: "Steve Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>,
	"North American Networking & Offtopic Gripes" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Steve Sobol
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:25 PM
> To: North American Networking & Offtopic Gripes
> Subject: Re: London incidents
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>=20
> > I think the world has shown that cellphones have been used=20
> over and over
> > to detonate explosive devices.  Why wait for it to be proved again
> > before doing something?  AFAIK "Emergency Only" mode allows for 911
> > calls,=20
>=20
> And means nothing if power is cut to the cell sites and you=20
> can't connect to=20
> anything. Emergency mode only works where there is a signal.

Good points. And thanks for not saying "Google said...".=20
Independant sources are not listed in google. :-).


[ObSecOp: FWIW, you can google how a cell phone can be used as a =
detonator
       and it does tend to demonstrate some thought on controlling cell
       signals as security policy...THAT is a good use for google.. -M< =
]

ObTechnoPoliButOffTopic:

If the UK GOV makes a tacit denial of such an event=20
that would hold  more[1] credibility than them pointing=20
at others saying they didn't do it.=20

[1] Slightly more, depending upon how high up.


-M<

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post