[82176] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Knowles)
Fri Jul 8 16:11:39 2005
In-Reply-To: <055301c5839b$4d7e2790$6401a8c0@alexh>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:43:55 +0200
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 1:59 AM -0700 2005-07-08, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
> You do not need to - any router have only `1 - 10% of all routing table
> active, and it is always possible to optimize these alghoritms.
If you've got proven solutions to all of the problems raised in
RFC 3869, section 3.3, I'm sure we'd love to hear about them. Heck,
if you've got even just one proven solution to one of those problems,
we'd love to hear about them.
But I think you're being more than a little disingenuous if you
do not have proven solutions and simply roll out "Let's replace all
the Internet core routers with dirt-cheap PCs" every time someone
talks about an Internet routing scalability problem.
Give me some evidence that you truly understand the problems of a
Tier-1 provider, and that you've got real-world solutions, and I'd be
perfectly happy to learn from whatever lessons you've got to teach.
But even I am smart enough to figure out that the "let them eat
cake" routine isn't particularly useful.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
