[82157] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kuhtz, Christian)
Fri Jul 8 16:04:04 2005

Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:55:19 -0500
From: "Kuhtz, Christian" <christian.kuhtz@bellsouth.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu



> My feeling is that the question isn't how much memory, but=20
> rather how =20
> much CPU and bandwidth is necessary to deal with routing thrash.  =20

Sure.  Resources in the end.

> Yes, you can aggregate different things to try to reduce the number =20
> of entries, but that would seem to go against the general=20
> idea Alexei =20
> was suggesting.  I mean, I'm an entity, and it'd be cool to have my =20
> own routed PI address and not have to deal with reconfiguring my =20
> network when I took my laptop from work to home...

Sure.  But, you think the majority of employers feel warm and fuzzy
about this...?  I would say the answer is a violent "hell no"...   Most
security folks get moderately freaked out by people moving machines back
and forth, let alone IP addresses.


*****
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to =
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or =
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other =
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by =
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If =
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the =
material from all computers. 162


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post