[82153] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Crocker)
Fri Jul 8 16:03:52 2005
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson) <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Reply-To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:44:05 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20050707.122708.5898.1241@webmail25.lax.untd.com>
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
> away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
> misunderstood your point...
i think we are agreeing.
i think that any prediction that users will not use nats for v6 involves=
logic
that can, at best, be called idealistic. naive would be another term to
consider.
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
