[82150] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fergie (Paul Ferguson))
Fri Jul 8 16:03:45 2005
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:26:28 GMT
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Dave,
I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
misunderstood your point...
$.02,
- ferg
-- Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
[re: shim6]
the effort is relying on IPv6 and on the disappearance of NATs, for v6. one
might consider these to be critical dependencies that are rather risky.
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg@netzero.net or fergdawg@sbcglobal.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
