[82148] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andre Oppermann)
Fri Jul 8 16:03:33 2005

Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:10:06 +0200
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
To: "Kuhtz, Christian" <christian.kuhtz@bellsouth.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <59A442ECD83D0F408ECEA3A84D3AE2EC03090BC8@bre2k26p>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
>>On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
>>
>>>What's the problem with independent address space for every entity
>>>(company,
>>>family, enterprise) which wants it?
>>
>>It doesn't scale.  Regardless of Moore's law, there are some
>>fundamental physical limits that constrain technology.
> 
> I would contend that is not true.  What says that every device inside a
> company, family, enterprise etc has to be available and reachable by
> anyone on the planet in a bidirectional fashion as far as session
> initiation is concerned?

Wasn't that the point of IP-Mobility?  Take your one-and-only IP address
anywhere you go?

-- 
Andre


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post