| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:31:19 -0400 From: Jason Frisvold <xenophage0@gmail.com> Reply-To: Jason Frisvold <xenophage0@gmail.com> To: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> Cc: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>, Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com>, nanog <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0506291723170.7139@parapet.argfrp.us.uu.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On 6/29/05, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow@mci.com> wrote: > look to the private networks luke... Seriously, many large private > ATM/Frame networks are transitioning to MPLS networks because the ATM or > Frame gear is/was/will-be-shortly EOL/EOS from the vendors. The costs to > run these networks don't jibe well with the alternatives. I figured MPLS was going to be the answer.. :) Now I must learn, research, implement, and debug! :) > Now, start the discussion on: "private network" and "mpls vpn" and "oops, > hey, that runs over the same routers as that bad-old Internet thing with > the haxors and such!" Heh... > :) >=20 --=20 Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0@gmail.com
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |