[81743] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Tue Jun 28 17:43:32 2005
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:43:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506282334120.3898@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>
> When people start to talk about blocking, just say no.
>
> It took our politicians in Sweden approx one month to start trying to
> extend the child porn filtering some large ISPs agreed to implement, to
> also include trafficking and prostitution advertising.
you could engage the gov't of panama and the local PTT there (cable &
wireless) about their experiences in attempting to filter voip traffic...
or rather in forcing ISP's there to filter voip for them, to protect the
PTT's revenue stream(s).
-Chris
