[81725] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Abhishek Verma)
Mon Jun 27 05:12:34 2005
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:42:04 +0530
From: Abhishek Verma <abhishekv.verma@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Abhishek Verma <abhishekv.verma@gmail.com>
To: Manav Bhatia <manav@riverstonenet.com>
Cc: Dan Evans <pzdevans@gmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <GONDORfyhk98N71UyeL0000000c@gondor.rs.riverstonenet.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Hi Manav,
Excellent Document!
I see that this document has expired. Are you folks thinking of
respinning a copy of this draft?
Thanks,
Abhishek
On 6/23/05, Manav Bhatia <manav@riverstonenet.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Daniel,
>=20
> We wrote a draft some time back comparing the two protocols ISIS and OSPF=
.
> It should address some of your doubts and concerns.
>=20
> Here's a pointer to my local copy:
>=20
> http://geocities.com/mnvbhatia/draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-00.txt
>=20
> Thanks,
> Manav
>=20
> !> -----Original Message-----
> !> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]
> !> On Behalf Of Dan Evans
> !> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:35 PM
> !> To: nanog@merit.edu
> !> Subject: OSPF -vs- ISIS
> !>
> !>
> !> All,
> !>
> !> Can anyone point me to information on what the top N service
> !> providers
> !> are using for their IGP? I'm trying to build a case for
> !> switching from
> !> OSPF to IS-IS. Those on this list who are currently running IS-IS, do
> !> you find better scalability and stability running IS-IS than OSPF? I
> !> understand that this question is a lot more complex than a simple yes
> !> or no since factors like design and routing policy will certainly
> !> affect the protocols behavior.
> !>
> !> Any insights or experiences that you can share would be most helpful.
> !>
> !> Thanks,
> !>
> !> Daniel Evans
> !> Alltel Communications
> !>
> !>
>=20
>=20
>=20
--=20
--
Class of 2004
Institute of Technology, BHU
Varanasi, India
