[81666] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Corlett)
Thu Jun 23 06:55:10 2005
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: abuse@cabal.org.uk (Peter Corlett)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dopiaza.cabal.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: news@cabal.org.uk
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Andrew Staples <andrews@ltinet.net> wrote:
> [...] the group wants to consolidate email addresses across the
> group, i.e.. Xx.yy@groupname.com, regardless of where the mail
> account lives, yet still give local control over the email server.
Due to the potential for namespace clashes, you *must* have a single
central organisation to manage the localpart namespace. MX records can
also only route mail on a domain basis, and not by localpart. Again,
this tends to drive centralisation.
[...]
> Has anyone got any other ideas on how to skin this cat with a
> technological solution not mentioned?
I would probably be tempted to just contract the whole lot out to a
third party that is not involved in your internal politics, including
maintaining a localpart registry.
The third party can then make a commercial decision as to the best way
to design the network is an complicated geographically load-balanced
cluster, or just to waste bandwidth and take a simpler system. Unless
they've got somebody CV-polishing, KISS will probably prevail as
bandwidth is cheap.
--
PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse@mooli.org.uk for full key
Please contribute to the beer fund and a tidier house:
http://search.ebay.co.uk/_W0QQfgtpZ1QQfrppZ25QQsassZpndc
