[81572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petri Helenius)
Sat Jun 18 13:13:41 2005
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:14:09 +0300
From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <OFF96FE2D6.A65508CC-ON80257023.0035CD95-80257023.003653E1@radianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
>
>Today, if Joe Business gets lots of spam, it is not his
>ISP's responsibility. He has no-one to take responsibility
>for this problem off his hands. But if he only accepts
>incoming email through an operator who is part of the
>email peering network, he knows that somewhere there is
>someone who will take responsibility for the problem.
>
>That is something that businesses will pay for.
>
>
>
Just look at the Postini numbers...
Pete
>But first, ISPs have to put their hands up and take
>collective responsibility for Internet email as a service
>that has value and not just as some kind of loss leader
>for Internet access services.
>
>--Michael Dillon
>
>
>
>
