[81547] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Jun 17 08:48:25 2005
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:50 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
Cc: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com, nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <42B2A166.7000405@ttec.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 17/06/05, Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
> DNSWL -- this is already being done. It is not widely viewed as being in
> any way similar to a peering concept. What would be more similar would
> be a consortium of large providers providing such a whitelist. That
> would be something I would welcome.
Something that is already being setup, and that tends to add a slight
amount of reputation to any authentication schemes that might be used,
is a "feedback loop"
Kind of like what we do, or what AOL does (http://postmaster.info.aol.com/f=
bl/)
Not public as such, but well it is as much like peering as anything in
the smtp email world can be. [e&oe gateways to uucp and x400]
--=20
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
