[81524] in North American Network Operators' Group
Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephane Bortzmeyer)
Thu Jun 16 06:56:48 2005
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:56:20 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <48798.1118655151@bizet.nethelp.no>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:32:31AM +0200,
sthaug@nethelp.no <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
> The number of agreements needed in the email world is significantly
> higher than what is needed for BGP.
The proponents of "email peering" typically want to switch from the
current model (millions of independant email servers) to a different
model, with only a few big actors.
--
"Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not."
Carl Hutzler
http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/
