[81391] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Finch)
Wed Jun 8 12:54:00 2005
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:53:32 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <bb0e440a05060723486b032e49@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 08/06/05, J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cybernothing.org> wrote:
> >
> > We can't have reliable reputation until we know who the mail is
> > coming from -- so reliable identity is a necessary first step.
>
> What the doctor ordered seems to be something like an API that'd let
> you plug dkim + csv into $mta
I don't think the lack of standard APIs is a problem: it seems to me that
the various MTA authors have been reasonably keen to support the various
nascent specifications, especially if they have a reasonably good
reference implementation library.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
