[81209] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Tue May 31 22:59:12 2005
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:28:44 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050531154743.GA1716@gsp.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 31/05/05, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:24:41PM -0700, Crist Clark wrote:
> > It appears VerizonWireless.com has some rather aggressive mail filters.
>=20
> Verizon is hopelessly clueless when it comes to mail system operations
> and mail filters -- as evidenced by their ongoing decision to deliberatel=
y
> provide anonymizing spam support and DoS attack services to anyone clever
Interesting rant, if one that I've heard before often enough, given
some spam-l posters' current obsession with "outscatter"
Anyway, you're ranting about Verizon. The OP has a problem with
Verizon Wireless, which seems a completely separate outfit, with a
different mail farm, different admins and postmasters (and different
corporate hierarchy upto a point - certainly different wrt operational
issues)
If you have operational rants about Verizon Wireless, fine. Else,
please leave the ranting for rants sake for spam-l or nanae. Makes
interesting reading there I guess, but I dont see much use for it on
nanog.
-srs
