[81179] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland )
Fri May 27 19:05:02 2005
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Nanog Mailing list <nanog@merit.edu>, brunner@nic-naa.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 May 2005 18:52:26 EDT."
<17047.42154.318865.950243@roam.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:31:02 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
as i've mentioned previously, when proposing a work-around for the mess
that a blind use of iso3166 causes for territorial jurisdictions, jon and
i were talking about using x.121 _in_theory_ to aggregate what i knew then
(and i know still are) technically weak and policy incomplete states in
the americas, and africa.
we were talking about nics, not nocs, but at that point in time (and now),
for some territorial jurisdictions, the distinction is artifician, a 1st
worldism.
http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/04468.html
definitely not that any of this will change the minds of any of the usual
cast of morons at the icann smorgy.
i don't have my correspondence with jon, some of it was simply chatting
at an ietf.
eric
