[81037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: soBGP deployment
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon May 23 22:51:31 2005
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:50:45 -0400
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>> o with sbgp, the assertion of the validity of asn A announcing
>> prefix P to asn B is congruent with the bgp signaling itself,
>> A merely signs the assertion in the bgp announcement.
>
>> o with sobgp, the assertion is in an external database with
>> issues such as
>
> This is nonsense. Did you even read the soBGP drafts?
yes
> In S-BGP the certificates are carried in path attributes, in soBGP in
> a new BGP message. Other than that, they do not differ in this regard.
you are confusing certificates and the attestation of routing
policy.
> Do I hear you say that S-BGP is less complex than soBGP??
yes
randy
