[81028] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VZ and VZW are completely separate (from an SMTP point of view)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Bittenbender)
Mon May 23 16:11:19 2005
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:10:52 -0700
From: John Bittenbender <kisanth88@gmail.com>
Reply-To: John Bittenbender <kisanth88@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505231527310.25968-100000@amethyst.justthe.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Steve,
You can let your contact know that Verizon Wireless does have some
employees on the list and it's been taken care of. I've forwarded
Christ w/Globalstar's issues on to appropriate parties within VZW.
As a reiteration, VZW's network infrastructure is completely
seperate from Verizon's. (with the exception of where they are a LEC)
JB
On 5/23/05, Steven J. Sobol <sjsobol@justthe.net> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> To get an answer on the VZW mail filtering issue, we'd have to talk to a
> mail admin at Verizon Wireless, as described by my acquaintance at Verizo=
n
> Online.
>=20
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:45:00 -0500
> From: <REDACTED@verizon.net>
> To: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists]
>=20
> Steve,
>=20
> Verizon Wireless is a completely different animal with no, repeat
> no, relation to VOL at any business or technical level other than being
> owned by the same mother ship. That would definitely include SMTP or
> any other mail related protocols transiting my platforms. I have no
> idea what kind of filters or block lists they use. I will make some
> inquiries but don't hold your breath, they really are a seperate entity
> from the trenches perspective. Please do not put my info on NANOG. Than=
ks.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>
