[80733] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet attack called broad and long lasting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed May 11 12:54:32 2005
To: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
Cc: Alexei Roudnev <alex@relcom.net>,
Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 May 2005 16:59:56 +0400."
<428201CC.4000008@linuxbox.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:51:56 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1115830315_6941P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 11 May 2005 16:59:56 +0400, Gadi Evron said:
> Well, I suppose it's not really a great idea to wait until things get
> wonky to establish good and operational relations with your uplink.
Fortunately for me, we've got such good operational relations with our
primary uplink that I don't even have to go outside to get to their NOC. ;)
The problem is that for most sites, "good operational relations with the uplink"
isn't 100% congruent to "uplink has their security act together". As a result,
you get to have the "Hello, Uplink? You guys get hacked?" "Umm.. yeah" phone
call...
--==_Exmh_1115830315_6941P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCgjgrcC3lWbTT17ARAiIlAJ4gOq5CywbSA6joC8eMVWT8HKkIbwCfRDh4
3+FrDhI7TeHe+xgOSr5D4wg=
=tEzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1115830315_6941P--
