[80437] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Sun May 1 12:56:20 2005
X-Original-To: wb8foz@panix.com
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 12:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505011637070.13686@sharpie.argfrp.us.uu.net> from "Christopher L. Morrow" at May 01, 2005 04:37:40 PM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
>
> > How about an anycast address implement(ed|able) by every network
> > provider that would return a zipcode?
> >
> > $ telnet 10.255.255.254
> > Connected
> > 33709
> > Disconnected.
>
> is there a unique zipcode in shanghai?
And even Zip+4 plus whatever they have now added to it will
not meet Big Brother's requirement in the USA.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
