[80430] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay R. Ashworth)
Sun May 1 12:27:26 2005

Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 12:25:52 -0400
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
To: North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m1DRRSv-008hEuC@rdaver.bungi.com>; from Dave Rand <dlr@bungi.com> on Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:07:17AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:07:17AM -0700, Dave Rand wrote:
> Dunno what a ton of ISP buy-in is, but the MAPS DUL now contains about
> 190,000,000 entries.  We've been working on it very hard for the last year or
> two.  Most ISP-level subscribers figure it stops a pretty large percentage of
> the compromised-home-computer spam.

Ok, so here's a question for your, Dave:

do you have a procedure for entertaining requests to be excluded from
your replies from people with legitimate needs to operate MTA's, who
have been given (let us say) static addresses by their providers which
fall within a range you understand to be dialup?

(I'm assuming you include cable and DSL end-user address pools; this is
the sort of thing I'm asking about.)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra@baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post