[80397] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Rand)
Fri Apr 29 20:44:33 2005
From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:44:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: "Miller, Mark"'s message on Apr 29, 15:32.
To: "Miller, Mark" <mark.miller@qwest.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
[In the message entitled "RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden" on Apr 29, 15:32, "Miller, Mark" writes:]
>
> Unfortunately, a lot of static "business" DSL IP space is still on
> those lists and legitimate mail servers can get blocked. I usually use
> the DUL as a "white list" to negate hits on the traditional dnsbls since
> those are almost always stale.
>
We have worked very hard with the ISPs to ensure that legitimate static space
isn't on the lists. We also do extensive amounts of work to ensure that
isn't the case.
You may be thinking of some other list, not the DUL.
--
