[80280] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Newton)
Thu Apr 28 02:55:39 2005

Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:38:00 +0930
From: Mark Newton <newton@internode.com.au>
To: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>,
	Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>,
	North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504280159200.27659-100000@amethyst.justthe.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:16:36AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:

 > Any IP that a provider allows servers on should have 
 > distinctive, non-dynamic-looking DNS (and preferably be in a separate 
 > netblock from the dynamically-assigned IPs).

What the hell is a "non-dynamic-looking DNS"?  Sure, if I see something
like "static-192-168-1-1.isp.net" I can be reasonably sure that it's
non-dynamic-looking, but what does the same thing look like in 
Portugese?  German?  Spanish?  French?  (Korean?  Chinese?)

Just wait'll we start getting unicode DNS names in non-English alphabets.
Perhaps then you can tell what to look for in a string of Kanji symbols
which might be suggestive of the concept of "static".

  - mark

-- 
Mark Newton                               Email:  newton@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer                          Email:  newton@atdot.dotat.org  (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd                 Desk:   +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post