|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:14:25 +0530 From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>, Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>, Hank Nussbacher <hank@mail.iucc.ac.il>, Adam Jacob Muller <adam@gotlinux.us>, Nanog Mailing list <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200504271645.j3RGjW0e015113@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On 4/27/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote: >=20 > Of course, the same ISPs that will use the ID in the email headers are, > by and large, the same ones that already know how to match the IP in the > headers to their radius/tacacs/etc logs.... >=20 With a great deal less effort. When you are trying to speed up processing of this sort, the less effort wasted and less time taken nailing down one trojaned box the better --=20 Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |