[80205] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Wed Apr 27 05:42:21 2005

Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:41:53 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
To: Jerry Pasker <info@n-connect.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <a06200704be94c35dbb4b@[66.6.34.245]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Jerry Pasker wrote:

> >I've been there -- I know how I feel about it -- but I'd love to know how ISP
> >operations folk feel about this.
> 
> It means 10 different things to 10 different people.  The article was 

yep, and the danger is you agree with the article and some politicians or
journalists think you are advocating a full police service which would be bad.

i do think we have an obligation to try to keep the net clean to a certain 
degree, think anti-ddos wg's etc but providing full security for all users is 
unrealistic. there seems to be some moves to offering partial security and this 
is probably a good thing eg blocking common ms ports will likely be effective.

Steve


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post